Sensible heat storage: Engineering and performance
Brilliant heat-to-heat, poor heat-to-power: the key trade-off
What this tab covers Engineering and operating performance: round-trip efficiency, whether power and energy can be scaled separately, footprint and siting, and safety.As a heat-in, heat-out device a sensible store is very efficient and its power and energy can be sized separately. Turning the heat back into electricity is a different story, with much lower efficiency.
Round-trip efficiency
FavourableHeat-to-heat efficiency is high because the only loss is leakage. Rondo claims above 97% for its 100 MWh unit (company claim, as reported), IRENA expects molten salt to exceed 92% and tank or solid stores to reach about 90%, and the Dronninglund pit store reached over 90% storage efficiency. Polar Night Energy quotes about 80% for its sand battery (company figure), and an Energy Innovation analysis assumes about 95% with heat losses below 1% a day for some designs. If heat is turned back into electricity through a steam turbine, efficiency falls sharply: Siemens Gamesa's rock store ran at about 25%, with over 42% hoped for at larger scale.135102123
Brick store, heat out (company claim) above 97%5 Molten salt, expected over 92%1 Sand battery (company figure) about 80%3 Industrial thermal battery, assumed / standby loss about 95%; under 1% a day23 Rock store, electricity out about 25% today; over 42% expected21Power and energy decoupling
FavourableCharging power is set by heaters and blowers and energy by the mass of material, so the two can be sized separately. Pornainen pairs 1 MW of output with 100 MWh, about 100 hours (calculated), while a 10-foot Kraftblock module holds about 4.2 MWh at 1 MW. Extra energy is cheap: molten salt storage costs USD 26.1 to 40 per kWh of heat and large Danish pit stores about EUR 30 per m3 of water. A US study sized stores to deliver 36 hours of heat with charging capacity 3.5 times the output, to soak up wind and solar hours.1271016
Pornainen power to energy 1 MW / 100 MWh, about 100 hours (calculated)2 Molten salt storage cost USD 26.1-40 per kWh heat (2020)1 Pit store benchmark about EUR 30 per m3 at 100,000 m3 or more10 Modelled US industrial store 36 hours; charging 3.5 times output16Footprint and siting flexibility
MixedSolid stores are compact and can go next to the user: Pornainen is about 13 m tall and 15 m wide, and Kraftblock's material holds up to 1.2 MWh per m3. Siemens Gamesa's rock bed held only about 0.2 MWh per m3. Water stores are bulky: Vojens needed 210,000 m3, so pit stores suit rural district heating. Aquifer stores need suitable groundwater layers, with Dutch wells 40 to 250 m deep, and building mass is fixed by the building itself.27101121
Pornainen dimensions about 13 m tall, 15 m wide2 Energy density, Kraftblock / Siemens Gamesa rock up to 1.2 / about 0.2 MWh per m3721 Dutch ATES well depth 40-250 m11Safety and thermal runaway risk
FavourableThere is no thermal runaway or toxic off-gas of the kind that drives lithium battery codes. The hazards are ordinary industrial ones: very hot surfaces, pressurised steam, hot air ducts and, for molten salt, a corrosive and oxidising liquid. Antora notes that carbon is used in fireproofing and is non-flammable. Such stores are governed mainly by boiler, pressure-equipment and building codes rather than by battery fire standards such as NFPA 855.913
Carbon block stability (company data) solid up to 3,500 C9Sources
- Innovation Outlook: Thermal Energy Storage IRENA, 2020
- World's largest Sand Battery now in operation (Pornainen press release, company data) Polar Night Energy, 2025
- Solution for clean energy's big problem (Pornainen reference, company data) Polar Night Energy, 2025
- Rondo Energy's 100 MWh solar-powered heat battery now operational (news report of company claims) ESS News, 2025
- Kraftblock thermal energy storage from upcycled industrial by-products (ACerS Bulletin feature) American Ceramic Society Bulletin, 2023
- Antora Energy launches ready-to-scale industrial decarbonisation technology, establishes new ultra-high temperature record Steel Technology, 2023
- Seasonal pit heat storage: cost benchmark of 30 EUR/m3 solarthermalworld.org, 2019
- 35 years of Dutch experience on ATES (Godschalk, SpeicherCity GeoTHERM workshop) University of Halle / SpeicherCity, 2024
- Study on the hybrid energy storage for industrial park energy systems, Table 2: thermal storage materials (National Science Open 3(3)) National Science Open, 2024
- Industrial Electrification in the United States (CAELP report) E3, 2024
- Review of Carnot Battery Technology Commercial Development (Novotny et al., Energies 15(2), 647) MDPI, 2022
- Industrial Thermal Batteries: Decarbonizing U.S. Industry While Supporting a High-Renewables Grid (Rissman) Energy Innovation, 2023