Material Insights · Understanding the Material World

Firewood and charcoal supply: Efficiency and losses

Why the kiln, not the road, wastes most of the energy

What this tab covers How much energy is lost while it moves and while it waits in storage or transit, and how much energy the transport itself consumes, in per cent.

The big loss is not on the road but in the kiln, where most of the wood's energy is lost before the charcoal is even bagged.

Chart: Efficiency ranges

Whole chain

Losses by measure

MeasureRangeTypeWhat is measured
Simple kilns in low-income countries, energy efficiency10 to 22%2Whole chainShare of wood energy kept in the charcoal
Traditional earth kiln, energy efficiency18%3Whole chainShare of wood energy kept in the charcoal, Rwanda average
Casamance improved kiln, energy efficiency32%3Whole chainShare of wood energy kept in the charcoal, Rwanda average
Kiln yield by dry weight12 to 40%3Whole chainKilograms of charcoal per kilogram of dry wood across more than 30 kilns (some exceed 40%)
Production plus end-use losses70 to 85%3Whole chainShare of original wood energy lost in kiln and cookstove combined
Wood-to-charcoal ratio, Tanzania10 kg wood per kg charcoal4Whole chainApproximate national ratio

Holding periods and inventory

MeasureValue
Kiln cycle, KenyaPlanning 2 to 3 days, drying 7 days, carbonising 7 days, cooling 1 day5
Former FAOSTAT conversion factor (to 1997)Charcoal weight multiplied by 6 to give wood equivalent8
Losses from breakage and fines in transportNot quantified in the sources found; FAO notes transport adds relatively little to the chain's greenhouse gas emissions2
Fuel used by trucks per tonne-kmNot quantified in the sources found3

Sources disagree on the wood-to-charcoal ratio: FAOSTAT formerly converted charcoal to wood at a factor of about 6, while Tanzanian field estimates use about 10 kg of wood per kg. The gap reflects different kilns, wood moisture and whether volume or weight is measured.

Firewood, by contrast, loses no energy in conversion but is bulky and heavy, so it is rarely carried far; most is gathered and used within walking distance. Transport losses are mainly time: kiln cycles of two to three weeks, and the hours that women and children spend collecting wood (in one Kenyan study, women carried loads of about 50 to 60 kg from forests 1 to 4 km away).

Sources

  1. The charcoal transition: greening the charcoal value chain to mitigate climate change and improve local livelihoods FAO, 2017
  2. Review of technologies for the production and use of charcoal (Kammen and Lew) Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, UC Berkeley, 2005
  3. Environmental Crisis or Sustainable Development Opportunity? Transforming the Charcoal Sector in Tanzania: A Policy Note World Bank, 2009
  4. Sustainable Business Models for Tree-based Value Chains in Sub-Saharan Africa: Analysis of the Charcoal Value Chain in Kenya (Mutta) Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Formas project, 2020
  5. The revision of woodfuel estimates in FAOSTAT (Whiteman, Broadhead and Bahdon) FAO, 2002